Tags
Boston Tea Party, Christianity, civil rights, conscience, Freedom, justice, Karl Barth, Law, liberty, March on Washington, March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, Martin Luther King Jr., racism, Socrates
Mr. Wicker: How are we to enforce law when a doctrine is preached that one man’s conscience may tell him that the law is unjust, when other men’s consciences don’t tell them that?
Dr. King: I think you enforce it, and I think you deal with it by not allowing anarchy to develop. I do not believe in defying the law, as many of the segregationists do, I do not believe in evading the law as many of the segregationists do. The fact is that most of the segregationists and racists that I see are not willing to suffer enough for their beliefs in segregation, and they are not willing to go to jail. I think the chief norm for guiding the situation is the willingness to accept the penalty, and I don’t think any society can call an individual irresponsible who breaks a law and willingly accepts the penalty if conscience tells him that that law is unjust.
I think that this is a long tradition in our society, it is a long tradition in Biblical history; Meshach and Abednego broke an unjust law and they did it because they had to be true to a higher moral law. The early Christians practiced civil disobedience in a superb manner. Academic freedom would not be a reality today if it had not been for Socrates and if it had not been for Socrates’ willingness to practice civil disobedience. And I would say that in our own history there is nothing that expresses massive civil disobedience any more than the Boston Tea Party, and yet we give this to our young people and our students as a part of the great tradition of our nation. So I think we are in good company when we break unjust laws, and I think those who are willing to do it and accept the penalty are those who are part of the saving of the nation.
__________
From Martin Luther King, Jr. on NBC’s Meet the Press. The interview took place on March 28th, 1965, a week after King led the five-day March from Selma to Montgomery, Alabama. You’ll find extended reflections on this in The Autobiography of Martin Luther King, Jr..
It’s astounding how patronizing the questioners are to King throughout this half hour segment. The entire interview is worth watching, but the quoted portion is copied below.
–
We are coming up on the 50th anniversary of the ‘March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom’ (people always forget the ‘Jobs’ part), so expect to find King’s name coming up not only on this site but throughout the media.
Below: Dr. King and Karl Barth outside the Princeton University chapel. On Sunday, April 29th, 1962, King preached the morning service and Barth taught the evening theology class. Not a bad day’s line-up.
William Ockham said:
Excellent find! I am working on a blogpost for next Tuesday on the eve of the 50th anniversary of the Washington Civil Rights March. As part of that, I re-read King’s “Letters from a Birmingham Jail” which is a fantastic and succinct discussion of the natural law:
“[T]here are two types of laws: there are just laws, and there are unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that “An unjust law is no law at all.” Now, what is the difference between the two? How does one determine when a law is just or unjust? A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law, or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas, an unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal and natural law. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust. All segregation statutes are unjust because segregation distorts the soul and damages the personality. It gives the segregator a false sense of superiority and the segregated a false sense of inferiority. To use the words of Martin Buber, the great Jewish philosopher, segregation substitutes an “I – it” relationship for the “I – thou” relationship and ends up relegating persons to the status of things. So segregation is not only politically, economically, and sociologically unsound, but it is morally wrong and sinful. Paul Tillich has said that sin is separation. Isn’t segregation an existential expression of man’s tragic separation, an expression of his awful estrangement, his terrible sinfulness?”
Peace,
W. Ockham
jrbenjamin said:
W. Ockham,
Thanks a ton for this. A brilliant and completely relevant additional to this post that I had never read before. It’s a fascinating subject — when does conscience override law, and can we know that in any frame but retrospectively? — and I appreciate your addition to it.
Thanks for writing and posting.
john said:
It is saddening today but it seems the current commentary climate is to bash MLK Jr’s reputation or at least try to sully it. What fools they are…
Pingback: The Top 10 American History Posts of 2013 | The Bully Pulpit
Pingback: Dissent, Not Disloyalty: MLK’s Immortal Words on Vietnam | The Bully Pulpit
Pingback: Martin Luther King on Conquering Self-Centeredness | The Bully Pulpit
Pingback: Andrew Jackson Says Farewell | The Bully Pulpit
Pingback: What Is a ‘State’? | The Bully Pulpit